I do believe the biggest impact would come from regulating large companies and billionaires, but it’s not one or the other.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the US, neither party is serious about stopping climate change. They are both controlled by big oil, big car, etc.

    • andrew@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is ideological diversity within the democratic party, especially at the local level. As part of a representative democracy, the electorate needs to be engaged with their representatives. You should start looking closely at your most local representatives.

    • vrojak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree the the democrats are not nearly serious enough about stopping climate change, but the republican party is actively hindering efforts and definitely worse for the plant in the long run.
      Neither party being serious does not mean one isn’t way worse than the other

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You still need to hold the Dems feet to the fire. Just handing them your vote as the least worst option just means you’ll never be offered any good options. Make them work for it.

          • JoBo@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can get involved in protests to try to make them pay attention. You can write letters to your representatives and prospective candidates. You can ask good questions at town halls. You can campaign for good candidates.

            Voting is the least important thing you can do. Ultimately you have no choice but to vote for the least worst option but if that’s the only thing you ever do, you’re helping to bury all of us.