TechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 11 months agoWould you agree?programming.devimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down12
arrow-up18arrow-down1imageWould you agree?programming.devTechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoThe problem is capitalism, not which kernel everything runs. And the reason FOSS isn’t universal is also capitalism.
minus-squarezagaberoo@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoIt’s more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.
minus-squarehellishharlot@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoMaking money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish
The problem is capitalism, not which kernel everything runs. And the reason FOSS isn’t universal is also capitalism.
It’s more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.
Making money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish