Asking specifically because of the situation over at !worldnews. I see that recently, there has been an open call for moderators - https://lemmy.ml/post/5277453 - with the following requirements:

“You have to be on the lemmy.ml instance” and “Should have a history of activity here”

Are these the only requirements really? Because I think that moderators have quite some extraordinary power within a community, to the point that they can just censor whatever is unpleasant to their personal opinion, as if it were violating the community’s rules when in fact it’s not.

(For instance, see the modlog over at !worldnews https://lemmy.ml/modlog/14788 - where everyone expressing doubts about the justification to call “genocide” the Israeli reaction to the Hamas terror attacks is banned. I just think that moderators should show some sense of the actual power they possess and be careful to exhibit it. As in the case above, despite the atrocities of war, there’s good reason not to speak of genocide - and even if that’s not the moderators’ opinion, expressing doubt about the justification to call it so does not violate the community’s rules.)

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I remembered two current examples since my last post: !fediverse@kbin.social and !internet@kbin.social.

    In both cases the lone mod is also the instance admin, who happens to be overworked and distracted at the moment. Both communities regularly get hit with spam pitching Amazon gift cards, prescription drugs, and political clickbait, which appears in my All feed. The posts stay up for days. If those communities had additional mods they could respond promptly and clean things up.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I notice in the case of kbin, all the spam has a negative score. Perhaps what lemmy needs is the ability to hide or de-emphasize content with a negative score.

      The whole reddit standard is designed to suppress unwanted content simply through voting. That doesn’t seem to be happening here.