• yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    What’s next? Launching a war against the Ukraine to please Putin?

    You dumb fucking orange man.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Netanyahu?

          Although it’s not like Trump is some puppet on a string. The whole US government wants war with Iran and it has for my entire life. There doesn’t need to be some secret master behind this (Israel, Russia, whatever)

          • Underfreyja@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Lol Netanyahu is not Trump’s master, he’s his business buddy.

            The guy thinks like an 80s caricature of a business man. He wants to build resorts in Gaza so he cozies up with Israel. Plus there’s oil and natural gas in Iran. Iran is a friend of China which Trump desperately wants to look strong against.

            He doesn’t care about Israel or Palestinians (or anyone for that matter) he couldn’t give two shits. If the roles were reversed, he would cozy up to the power in charge.

            I’m not saying he’s a great strategist, I think he goes with the opportunities and jumps on them when he can and he takes a lot of miscalculated risks, exactly like he run his other businesses.

            But one thing for sure, he asked Putin before he did launched his pew pews on Iran.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Do you think Biden wouldn’t have done the exact same thing to “defend” Israel?

              This is clearly about Israel and the long-time desire for war with Iran in the US government. Blaming Russia is, frankly, absurd.

              Trump certainly would like to have Putin as a business buddy, he’s an 80’s deals guy after all, but there’s no business here that benefits Russia so that’s also absurd. Russia does not benefit from Iran’s collapse. This is very bad for Russia.

              • Underfreyja@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                I’m not blaming Russia, I’m not saying Dems were not gonna side with Israel. You asked if Putin wanted the strikes on Iran. I’m saying there’s no way he wasn’t on board.

                Does he like it? I don’t know but one thing for sure is he knew about the strikes and agreed to them. With all that Trump did to benefit Putin up till then, no way in hell he didn’t ask permission to do that move…

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  And I’m saying there’s no way Putin wants Iran to be bombed, and so therefore this was done without his permission or knowledge.

      • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Strangely yes. This jacks up the price of oil in a way that doesn’t dirty Putin’s hands. It’s a bit of a weird play but makes some sense.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Iran is a major trade partner and an important partner in the Ukraine War and they were both important allies of Assad and worked closely together in Syria. They have deep ties. There’s no way the price of oil is worth losing one of their key allies in the region.

          • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Why not? They have strategic value sure but Russia is nearly bankrupt, Iran for an extra year or two of solvency makes sense to me. Further weakens the US too.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              It told you why not! Because Iran is an important regional ally and business partner and military asset.

              Russia sacrificing an ally like this for something as paltry as “gas prices” would be short-sighted in the extreme.

              Although since you seem to think Russia is “nearly bankrupt” and that this only buys them “an extra year or two” that explains why you don’t think this matters.

              • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                Yeah the condescending really explained your point. Import export numbers, critical resources only Iran provides Russia, strategic geographic and political value. You really covered it all in those… 3 sentences formatted as paragraphs. Worthless. Down vote me if you failed econ 1.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  Jesus do you want me to write you an essay?

                  I will say they just entered a new 20-year bilateral trade and military cooperation treaty on Jan 17th of this year, which is hardly something Russia would do if they were willing to just destroy Iran in a few months. They did this because trade between the countries has risen sharply due to the sanctions against Russia, and that’s not going away any time soon so it would be foolish to sacrifice them at this stage. Then there’s the suspected missiles and drones that Iran has been (possibly) supplying Russia for its war with Ukraine, and blowing them up would disrupt that supply line.

                  But if you’re determined to believe Russia wants Iran to be bombed, I won’t be able to stop you.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            If Iran gets their own nukes, then Russia loses a big bargaining chip.

            Honestly, that’s probably the only reason why nukes weren’t used.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              If Iran gets their own nukes, one of Russia’s most important allies in the region is safe from attack. That seems a lot more useful than a “bargaining chip”. Now, Russia risks losing an important ally and whatever bargaining chip they may have had.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                You’re reading the play like Russia wants an ally.

                What they want is a dependent.

                • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Russia is a real country run by actual human beings. They’re not Mordor with a dark lord commanding an army of orcs. And Russia wants allies. They’re up against a vast global US-lead alliance system. Of course they want allies.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Only empires can have dependency, Russia isn’t nearly that strong. Russia needs allies or it will be overwhelmed.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I have to say, the one good part of Trump in office is at least you lot aren’t lecturing people on why invading Iran is good, actually!

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago
        • W. Bush says Iran is in Axis of Evil bullshit basically telling Iran “you’re next!” while invading Iraq. Iran starts a nuclear program in response.
        • Obama fixed things by making a treaty with Iran, and got the Nobel Peace Prize (though not in that order which was a bit weird, but whatever)
        • Trump cancels that treaty and assassinates an Iranian General
        • Biden tries to restore the Obama treaty, but Iran doesn’t trust the US (wonder why?). So no treaty, but also no war with Iran.
        • Trump gets in again drops some really big bombs on Iran

        “BOTH SIDES!” say both the MAGAs and leftists in unison.

        • Aqarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Yeah, you’re right. I’m sure the Democrats would not have supported Israel in Iran, same as how they didn’t support Israel in Yemen, or in Lebanon, or in Gaza, or in Syria, or in…

          • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            If Kamala had won, I (trans latina) would not have had to flee the US. But they’re both the exact same amirite? (I’m honestly a little grateful for that. The US is trash. I’m never moving back)

            Edit: my point is that people are literally fleeing the US because it’s a sinking ship. Under Kamala, immigration and tourism wouldn’t have changed much

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            You’re doing the leftist reductive thing so complex issues become a simplistic “it’s all the system, man…”

            This doesn’t make you look as clever as you think it does. It’ll eventually turn you into a conspiracy nut where everything is because of “them”. Please make an effort to stay on topic.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Obama fixed things by making a treaty with Iran, and got the Nobel Peace Prize (though not in that order which was a bit weird, but whatever)

          I don’t understand how anyone could be so blatant about their own mental gymnastics.

        • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’m not an American so what I see maybe different than what you see. But you know you would be lying if you say US would just allow iran to bomb tel aviv and sit watching. Both sides may not be same but both of em are held by balls by Israel.

                • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  You might actually be slow. You are the one that’s being irrelevant. Anyways you made up your mind. I can’t change it. Like it or not Israel is your president. Kiss their boots like you have been doing for the last century

  • romantired@shibanu.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    Anyone who still thinks Trump is to blame just isn’t paying attention.

    These strikes would’ve happened no matter who the president was it’s a geopolitical inevitability.

    And yes, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Ukraine is in serious trouble now.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’m waiting to see if Trump/pentagon escalates or does their strike package and goes home.

      I doubt this is going to lead to some sort of ground invasion. Biden would have done the exact same although maybe more clandestine.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Taiwan and South Korea probably shittting their pants right about now as well. Daddy’s about to be too busy to help out when their possed off neightcome knocking

      • romantired@shibanu.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        They’ll be next — just not immediately. Over the next couple of years, Ukraine will likely be partitioned, and as the war with Iran de-escalates, a new conflict will be needed to fill the vacuum. That’s how the cycle tends to work.