Saying exactly what you mean is confusing to you, isn’t it?
Saying exactly what you mean is confusing to you, isn’t it?
That’s not at all how we were interpreting this, and I don’t know how you decided we were.
And yet, the person in the screenshot was surprised that giving their child something to do was good for them.
This is an absolutely bizarre way you’ve chosen to interpret the post.
Have you ever even met a child?
The fact that you’re at odds with everyone else in the thread should tell you everything you need to know, but the entire point of the post was that giving their child something to do solved a lot of problems.
Humans don’t respond well to having nothing to do.
You are incredibly good at missing the point.
It’s the entire moral of the story.
You’ve made the exact same reply three different times.
That is exactly what I said, and exactly what I meant. People need something to do.
Humans don’t respond well to having nothing to do.
Second comment was definitely in on the joke. Well played, actually.
I mean, just look at the potato famine, that was on par with any pandemic.
I mean, killing a member of the government will definitely get the government’s attention.
I just want to watch the place burn.
I’d love to see another boycott on the day of the IPO.
That’s a lot more effort than I’m willing to go to.
It’s common courtesy to post the plain text of a paywalled article.
Holy shit, you’re everywhere in this thread.
I do think you’re right, the chances of a hit going wrong are far too high.