• sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      Isn’t this legitimately how Koreans count their age? Like, I think you pop out as a 1 year old according to their age system.

      • AxExRx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        6 days ago

        From what I understand, they’ve been using the ‘normal’ system for most legal things since the 60s, and that was just how they socially talked about age, until it was abandoned in 2023.

        The old system also added a year on New years, not on your birthday. Meaning a baby born 2 days ago would be 2 years old if they were born on December 31. Apparently, laws do still keep that standard for some age based regulations, like school, drinking age, voting age, and draft. Which kind of makes sense; everyone born in X year gains those things at the same time. A less arbitrary cut off date for schools, no awkward math whe checking IDs, just born in ‘04, you’re good.’

        Still seems confusing having 3 ages in different contexts though.

        • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Fun fact: up until fairly recently, babies weren’t often named until at least their second birthday. Hence, headstones with “baby”, “junior”, etc. littering pioneer graveyards and similar.

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            That kinda makes sense. Giving a name before knowing how the childs behaviour, temperament or similar is rather unintuitive. Also probably makes the loss a bit less hard if the child dies before it’s at least a year old, which is probably the root cause for that costume.

            • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              It wasn’t because of a hesitance to misname them. It was purely because of mortality rates. I appreciate your optimism, though. 🥹

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          Thanks for the context!

          I went to school with a couple of Korean international students who explained their age hierarchy to me once, but I didn’t really grasp the intricacies of it.

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Oh that’s kind of sad. It must have been pretty convenient to have everyone from the same year legally age up at once, from a bureaucratic standpoint at least.

    • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      This has always bothered me about the bullshit pro-life argument. If life starts at conception, then clearly we’re making people wait an additional 9 months to vote.

      • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        There is actually one problem with counting age from birth: premature babies are behind on everything! Of course we could correct that by saying that they were minus three months old when born (or however early they are).

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s it, we’ll have to get rid of democracy now, there’s too many flaws.