Prenup = Prenuptual agreement, which is a contract two people sign before they get married, usually to determine who will get what in the event of a divorce. It’s usually used to avoid lengthy and costly divorce proceedings.
Pension = An older type of retirement account
So, that ho on Instagram stayed married to him for two years, fulfilling the terms of their prenuptial agreement, entitling her to full divorce benefits, which will be about half of this guy’s fortune, which should be enough for her to retire on.
Prenups can have whatever in them. Common is for the poorer person to get nothing or a limited part of the other person’s wealth. Idea is to avoid giving away 50% of your shit if you’re rich. But there’s no set rules about what the terms can be.
I’m assuming Dilbert guy just wanted to have at least 2 years worth of sex if he was gonna give her a bunch of money in a divorce.
He had already invested alots in this girlfriend and did not want to have to begin again with a new girlfriend. Opportunity cost is a serious thing. Is it more work (and alots I guess) to solve/bury the problem or to get a new partner and invest time and energy in them to get the same level of closeness?
Aren’t there websites for rich dudes looking for women? I seem to remember reading about that. Why not just post on there that he’s the Dilbert guy and whatever his stipulations are. Someone would probably bite. He didn’t seem lile that gross of a dude other than his politics. I’d certainly be willing to over look some shit if a rich lady was willing to house me and pay for my all my shit. Unfortunately I’m not that attractive.
Tbf if there’s a 2 year “pension pre-nup”, I don’t think there was any closeness there. I’m fairly sure that whole thing was transactional from the get-go. Though I could be wrong of course.
Insta = Instagram
THOT = That Ho Over There
Prenup = Prenuptual agreement, which is a contract two people sign before they get married, usually to determine who will get what in the event of a divorce. It’s usually used to avoid lengthy and costly divorce proceedings.
Pension = An older type of retirement account
So, that ho on Instagram stayed married to him for two years, fulfilling the terms of their prenuptial agreement, entitling her to full divorce benefits, which will be about half of this guy’s fortune, which should be enough for her to retire on.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
Smart cookie
Never knew THOT is an acronym. I always just read it as a new slang word.
Why was the prenup 2 years? Do most prenup have a minimum time till you get all their money?
Prenups can have whatever in them. Common is for the poorer person to get nothing or a limited part of the other person’s wealth. Idea is to avoid giving away 50% of your shit if you’re rich. But there’s no set rules about what the terms can be.
I’m assuming Dilbert guy just wanted to have at least 2 years worth of sex if he was gonna give her a bunch of money in a divorce.
Oh that’s wild. So it’s his own fault in a way.
He put a timer on his marriage.
Oh he must’ve known she wouldn’t stay for long. It’s all in him lol
Why get married then is beyond me. He’s got money, could just pay for the girlfriend experience and have one high end girl on retainer for that.
He had already invested alots in this girlfriend and did not want to have to begin again with a new girlfriend. Opportunity cost is a serious thing. Is it more work (and alots I guess) to solve/bury the problem or to get a new partner and invest time and energy in them to get the same level of closeness?
Aren’t there websites for rich dudes looking for women? I seem to remember reading about that. Why not just post on there that he’s the Dilbert guy and whatever his stipulations are. Someone would probably bite. He didn’t seem lile that gross of a dude other than his politics. I’d certainly be willing to over look some shit if a rich lady was willing to house me and pay for my all my shit. Unfortunately I’m not that attractive.
Tbf if there’s a 2 year “pension pre-nup”, I don’t think there was any closeness there. I’m fairly sure that whole thing was transactional from the get-go. Though I could be wrong of course.
Seconding the guy who said you can put whatever you want in a prenup
Thanks !