JackLSauce@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 4 months agoThe percentage of the population who did/didn't know of Crowdstrike probably reversed in the past weekmessage-squaremessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1167arrow-down15
arrow-up1162arrow-down1message-squareThe percentage of the population who did/didn't know of Crowdstrike probably reversed in the past weekJackLSauce@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 months ago“Cute, but no.” is accurate. You can calculate that in the shower. Showerthoughts isn’t an excuse to be dumb. Some of the people here are in the theme of “I didn’t mean ‘literally’ when I said ‘literally’”.
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-24 months agoSo the actual showerthought is what, “More people probably know about Crowdstrike now compared to last week?”
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoBut that wouldn’t be worth posting. Might as well just make the title, “So… Crowdstrike, eh?”
“Cute, but no.” is accurate. You can calculate that in the shower. Showerthoughts isn’t an excuse to be dumb.
Some of the people here are in the theme of “I didn’t mean ‘literally’ when I said ‘literally’”.
So the actual showerthought is what, “More people probably know about Crowdstrike now compared to last week?”
But that wouldn’t be worth posting. Might as well just make the title, “So… Crowdstrike, eh?”