• Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    It can’t.

    It’s a logistical nightmare. In order to be rewarded for your efforts, you need some system of evaluating the worth of every effort. Any societal system that exists is made by at least one person, and every person had biases and ambitions.

    There’s no way to prevent cheating, because any rule to prevent cheating will be ignored, because that’s what cheating is. Any rules to make cheating harder only make it harder, not impossible.

    Oh look, it seems the act of deciding a person’s worth to society is 100 times the worth of a labourer. And the worth of a writer for Batman is 20 times the worth of a writer for Spider Man. Oh, my physicist girlfriend just broke up with me… Looks like that’s practically worthless now!

    Wait, what’s a youtuber? Is that a new thing? I made my value system back in 2002, so this is all new to me! You’re not on the list, so I guess you’re not worth anything? I guess we could make the list again, and while we’re there, my opinions on Batman have changed, so we can tweak some other things too.

    Ah, the problem is that a person’s worth is entirely subjective… But what if we press it down into clear and objective statistics? What if we limit it to a single statistic, and a person’s value is entirely related to raising that statistic? We can call the statistic… Capital!

    So a person’s value in society is entirely tied to their ability to obtain as much capital as possible, no matter what they do. Ah, meritocracy.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not convinced you actually read my comment before responding.

        I don’t even think you wanted a discussion. I think you just want to say your belief and have it treated as fact.

          • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay, you definitely didn’t read my comment if that’s what you think it was. Let me sum it up for you:

            • A person’s merit is subjective.
            • Judging merit based on subjective values will bring in biases and corruption.
            • Judging merit based on objective values is impossible, and will need to be a simplification.
            • In either case, people will game the system to raise their value, regardless of whether they actually contribute anything of merit.
            • Any system will become outdated VERY quickly, as society is always changing.
            • Capitalism only judges the acquisition of capital, which is not a merit.
            • A person can cheat literally any system if they try hard enough.

            I explained all of that without a single anecdote.

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              From which semi-tautological contortions we can conclude that, uh, capitalism probably isn’t the problem, after all.

              • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                First, my conclusion is that meritocracy is impossible. Your conclusion was something you came up with on your own.

                Second, capitalism isn’t the ONLY problem. It’s still a problem. Greed will corrupt any system, but capitalism is a system that openly rewards this corruption.

              • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t think I said “nothing can be done”. I just said meritocracy is impossible. And since it’s impossible, we need a different system we can actually achieve. It won’t be without flaws, but we can still aim to have LESS flaws than currently.

                You don’t improve by pretending nothing’s wrong.

                • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t think I said “nothing can be done”. I just said meritocracy is impossible.

                  Why would I want to discuss anything with someone who will contradict themselves in the first two sentences they mutter.

                  • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    There are options other than “meritocracy” and “nothing”, you know. It’s worrying that didn’t occur to you.