• 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe it’s because I’m only using it as plan B or C (after the documentation has already failed me), but I have never gotten any usable code out of chatGPT.

    And yet co-pilot is able to finish my code perfectly after I type the first few characters… even though they’re the same model.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Co-pilot isn’t using the same model. They’re using a model that’s been trained on a LOT of open-source code.

    • garyyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      ChatGPT is amazing for describing what you want, getting a reasonable output, and then rewriting nearly the whole thing to fit your needs. It’s a faster (shittier) stack overflow.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I normally have it output toy examples of the syntax I don’t want to bother learning and then remix that into what I need. IMO it’s better than stackoverflow because stackoverflow code is more likely to be not really what you were searching for or not actually run because the author didn’t bother testing it and there’s a typo or something.