Not much familiar wirh metrics for evaluating progression in medical fields, so asking in general sense.

  • Adcott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Neat. I was actually talking with optom students roughly a decade ago about how AI was imminently going to make a lot of this work redundant.

    ~~ Small note: you probably mean things like glaucoma, macular degeneration and other retinopathies, not cataracts. (Cataracts are just lens opacities) ~~ ignore that. Am idiot.

    • dfyxA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I did mean cataracts. We usually do OCTs of the anterior segment (cornea to lens; uses a different wavelength for imaging) to plan lens surgery and measure keratoconus (among other things) but as a side effect, even in seamingly healthy eyes you can measure how optically dense different parts of the lens are to predict when cataracts are going to form. It’s hard to do by just looking at the OCT image because the way the lens looks depends on many factors but there have been some interesting AI-based approaches popping up lately.

      But sure, with a posterior segment OCT, you can detect all the things you mentioned.

      • Adcott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wow sorry I stand corrected. That’s very cool!

        I’m not in the industry any more but when you said grading I stupidly thought you meant like what I was doing monitoring diabetic retinopathy OCT scans.