What about similar oddities in English?
(This question is inspired by this comic by https://www.exocomics.com/) (I couldn’t find the link to the actual comic)

  • Ironfist79@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    We should be consistent and say “readed”. While we’re on the subject, why isn’t the past tense of go “goed”?

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    How about we go with reed and red… see, you already know how to pronounce them!

  • 2piradians@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    On a different note there is Reading, a football club in UK, which is pronounced “Redding”. This pronunciation is akin to the Reading Railroad from Monopoly (which I mispronounced all my life until today).

    Little details, picked up along the way.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      How did I get to the lead merchant? I was led here. But in the price negotiation, I took the lead.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Where, were, we’re. Even native speakers have problems with this. I don’t know how many times I had to correct such cases, especially with American authors.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Pretty much only native speakers have problems with this, I see this type of mistake far less frequently with those who learned English as an additional language.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Pretty much only native speakers have problems with this

        99% agree with this. This is a native speaker issue, except where someone took up bad habits from the natives…

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Exactly. People with English as a second language go from meaning to writing. Native speakers go from sound to writing.

        There, their, they’re is something native speakers confuse as well. I have only ever observed native speaker write should of instead of should‘ve or should have.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Pretty much only native speakers have problems with this

        That makes no sense since they would use it more, however native speakers from the US do have problems with it, and other words (they’re/their).

        Rarely encounter it with others.
        Their spelling is embarrassing, same as their very limited vocabulary. IDK what they do in schools.

        • bigfondue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Native speakers acquire the language before learning to read. Remember, writing is a representation of spoken language not the other way round.

          • bigfondue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 minutes ago

            No it is. People were speaking for tens of thousands of years before they started writing. Modern people see the written word as more valid than spoken, but it’s a historical quirk that words pronounced identically should be spelled differently in English. Words that are spelled differently in English were once pronounced differently as well, but languages change and our spelling system is frozen in the 1600s.

            • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              42 minutes ago

              Modern people are the written word as more valid than spoken

              Now there’s a sentence I can’t make sense of.

              There is no influence of history in when kids learn to write their language or if they used it orally, they learn to write it then how it’s supposed to be written.
              If your reasons were valid every Anglo would have problems, they don’t.
              Since it’s noticably the US specifically I can only assume it’s sub standard education.
              As confirmed by their poor vocabulary compared to other Anglo’s

    • mapu@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I pronounce these all differently though? [wɛɹ], [wəɹ] and [wiɹ]

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Maybe, yes, but as someone who has seen tons of unedited writings, I can tell you those mixup as common as muck.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Where, were, we’re.

      I never had a problem with those, until I started with stuff like Reddit.

      Now, I find myself making the mistake and catching it in proofreading.
      Guess my brain is starting to age too.

  • Hedup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Rob Words youtube channel is basically wtf english. And he has tons of content, and it keeps comming.

  • afk_strats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The Chaos by Gerard Nolst Trenité (1922)

    https://ncf.idallen.com/english.html

    Dearest creature in creation
    Studying English pronunciation,
    I will teach you in my verse
    Sounds like corpse, corps, horse and worse.

    I will keep you, Susy, busy,
    Make your head with heat grow dizzy;
    Tear in eye, your dress you’ll tear;
    Queer, fair seer, hear my prayer.

    Pray, console your loving poet,
    Make my coat look new, dear, sew it!
    Just compare heart, hear and heard,
    Dies and diet, lord and word.

    Very long. Highly recommended

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is the grammar thing I fuck up the most, and I don’t call people on it because I’m pretty sure I don’t know how it works. Autocorrect changes it & I just say “oh, whoops”, and it still looks wrong…

      • wols@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My keyboard is very keen on completing “it’s” regardless of context. I imagine this is the case for most people, since usually I see “it’s” when “its” would be correct.

        I also think it’s difficult to know that “it’s” is wrong to use because it feels like it follows the common apostrophe for possession rule:
        “Australia’s capital is Canberra” -> “Australia is the largest country in Oceania. It’s capital is Canberra.” (wrong, but intuitive)

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        it’s means “it is”. It is really not difficult, just pretend you are Data and swear off contractions.

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I think the contraction vs possesive thing messes with me, and my brain can never settle on what goes where when, how, or why…

          • amelia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Just try changing it to “it is”. If the sentence still makes sense, it’s “it’s”. Otherwise it’s “its”.

      • everett@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Here’s a shortcut: test if you could drop “his” into the same spot and have it make sense. (And you’d definitely never write it as hi’s.) If “his” would work, “its” would work.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Pretty sure the past tense of “lead” is actually “led.”

      Unless of course you’re referring to the type of metal, lead, which I guess the meme isn’t clear on.